Link-uri naturale vs. link-uri generate - discutii despre principii

[Tom]

Merci Krumel: si as vrea sa incepem discutia de la binecunoscutul email care apare din iunie 2011 in toata lumea:

Google Webmaster Tools notice of detected unnatural links to "aaa"

We've detected that some of your site's pages may be using techniques that are outside Google's Webmaster Guidelines.
Specifically, look for possibly artificial or unnatural links pointing to your site that could be intended to manipulate PageRank. Examples of unnatural linking could include buying links to pass PageRank or participating in link schemes.
We encourage you to make changes to your site so that it meets our quality guidelines. Once you've made these changes, please submit your site for reconsideration in Google's search results.
If you find unnatural links to your site that you are unable to control or remove, please provide the details in your reconsideration request.
If you have any questions about how to resolve this issue, please see our Webmaster Help Forum for support.
Sincerely,
Google Search Quality Team

Sunt 2 tipuri de e-mail, cu link-uri catre site, si din site. Am citit foarte multe topicuri si se pare ca pt cele "din site" , dupa ce scoti tot, "scapi". Pentru cele "catre site", nu scapi, decat la "bulan".

Pentru cei care au primit asa ceva, sau pentru cei care se astepta sa primesca asa ceva, as dori o discutie si ideal sa gasim cateva solutii, pe care se pare ca nu le-au gasit altii. Sunt cateva variante, o sa le testez imediat ce site-ul isi ia "ban". Site-ul este confidential!

Detalii: vechime mare, root >1000, linkuri naturale destule, directoare < 50, ..... nimic dubios. Clar a fost Raport si evaluare manuala. Orice site (optimizat) la evaluare manuala, pica testul!!!