22nd February 2016, 11:34
#7
1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

Postat în original de
Uxela
-PageSpeed este un factor relativ important in ranking.
Da-ne una-doua surse pentru aceasta informatie te rog.
Din teste reiese ca nu e nicio corelatie, de aia sunt curios.
28th February 2016, 02:43
#8
1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

Postat în original de
Uxela
-PageSpeed este un factor relativ important in ranking.
Din testele MOZ reiese altceva:
https://moz.com/blog/how-website-spe...search-ranking (mai sunt si alte teste, am ales cel de la moz pentru ca l-ai citat)
Our data shows there is
no correlation between "page load time" (either document complete or fully rendered) and ranking on Google's search results page. This is true not only for generic searches (one or two keywords) but also for "long tail" searches (4 or 5 keywords) as well.
We did not see websites with faster page load times ranking higher than websites with slower page load times in any consistent fashion.
To begin our research, we worked with Matt to create a list of of 2,000 random search queries from the 2013 Ranking Factors study. We selected a representative sample of queries, some with as few as one search term ("hdtv"), others as long as five ("oklahoma city outlet mall stores") and everything in between. We then extracted the top 50 ranked search result URLs for each query,
assembling a list of 100,000 total pages to evaluate.
In concluzie - ce ne intereseaza pe noi - corelatia intre pagespeed si rezultate - exista doar in teorie, nu si in practica.
6th December 2016, 18:52
#9
0 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
Nu va mai luati dupa MOZ , o gramada de prosti spun pe blog-ul lor .
Pagespeed este foarte important , de ce ?
1.Pentru ca big G considera pagespeed-ul un factor de ranking (mai mic sau mai mare depinde)
2.Daca site-ul se incarca in 5 secunde , lumea o sa dea back si o sa intre pe alt site ( competitor) G vede asta si iti da un mare - ( minus) acesta este un factor MARE .
Mult succes !