Noutati De La Google

[Tom]

Intamplarea face ca loc 2 sa fie redirect la loc 1, eu sa caut defapt loc 3 ( what font is, mult mai bun decat loc 1,2) iar linkul cu chrome sa primeasca peste 50% din clik-uri fiind un addon util. Era doar un exemplu pe care eu il consider o erroare a lui google. Ma cramponez in niste teste acum.

[Marius Cristian]

iar linkul cu chrome sa primeasca peste 50% din clik-uri fiind un addon util.

De unde stii asta?

[madalin_wrc]

Mi se pare mie sau linkul duce catre un grup in limba engleza, tu l-ai creat sau doar participi ? Numai bine

[Krumel]

Webmaster Central office-hours, August 27, 2012 - YouTube Pentru cine are timp sa asculte.

[avram]

se simt noi schimbari Google Search Update On August 28th? !? oare dupa 00:00

[Alex Dumitru]

se simt noi schimbari Google Search Update On August 28th? !? oare dupa 00:00

Am am avut din nou o crestere pe cateva site-uri noi.
6 luni vechime, asa s-a comportat la fiecare update Panda si Pinguin.

[slobodan]

La fel si la mine dar nu stiu cat tine de Google si cat de faptul ca e sfarsit de august si lumea revine de prin concedii.

[danielicb]

Inside Search: An update to our search algorithms

[100R]

In caz ca intereseaza pe cineva, patentul Google pentru detectarea tentativelor de manipulare, nu stiu daca a fost creat sau doar actualizat pe August 14, 2012 ca n-am stiut de el initial, cei ce stiu de document sa-l ignore, asta ar trebui sa fie lege nescrisa, sunt multe, doar asa cateva informatii:

The purpose of rank-modifying spamming is to raise the rank of a document so that the document appears highly ranked in a set of search results even if that document is not relevant, or not as relevant as some lower ranked documents, to the search query. Various techniques exist, such as keyword stuffing, invisible text, tiny text, page redirects, META tags stuffing, and link-based manipulation.

...

The spammer's behavior may be observed to detect signs that the document is being subjected to rank-modifying spamming (block 860). For example, if the rank changed opposite to the initial 10% change, then this may correspond to a reaction to the initially-inverse response transition function. Also, if the rank continues to change unexpectedly (aside from the change during the transition period due to the rank transition function), such as due to a spammer trying to compensate for the undesirable changes in the document's rank, then this would be a sign that the document is being subjected to rank-modifying spamming.

---

When signs of rank-modifying spamming exist, but perhaps not enough for a positive identification of rank-modifying spamming, then the "suspicious" document may be subjected to more extreme rank variations in response to changes in its link-based information. Alternatively, or additionally, noise may be injected into the document's rank determination. This noise might cause random, variable, and/or undesirable changes in the document's rank in an attempt to get the spammer to take corrective action. This corrective action may assist in identifying the document as being subjected to rank-modifying spamming.

If the document is determined to be subjected to rank-modifying spamming, then the document, site, domain, and/or contributing links may be designated as spam. This spam can either be investigated, ignored, or used as contra-indications of quality (e.g., to degrade the rank of the spam or make the rank of the spam negative).

United States Patent: 8244722

[avram]

"Just fyi, we rolled out a small algo change this week that improves the diversity of search results in terms of different domains returned." Matt Cutts
https://twitter.com/mattcutts/status/246713559080390656