Felicitari pentru "gaselnita" Iskander.
Am postat pe forum sub titlul W3C Valid Code & Google o parere a lui Matt Cutts despre acest lucru.
People sometimes ask whether Google should boost (or penalize) for valid (or invalid) HTML. There are plenty of clean, perfectly validating sites, but also lots of good information on sloppy, hand-coded pages that don’t validate. Google’s home page doesn’t validate and that’s mostly by design to save precious bytes. Will the world end because Google doesn’t put quotes around color attributes? No, and it makes the page load faster.Eric Brewer wrote a page while at Inktomi that claimed 40% of HTML pages had syntax errors. We can’t throw out 40% of the web on the principle that sites should validate; we have to take the web as it is and try to make it useful to searchers, so Google’s index parsing is pretty forgiving.
Eu nu cred ca e un criteru ca site-urile valide sa fie primele. Defapt nu are nici o treaba lucrul asta cu rezultatele la cautari.So How Do I Bring My Site In Compliance With W3C Standards?
To be sure, this is easier said than done. Obviously the ideal solution is to have your site designed in compliance to begin with. If you already have a website you have one of two options:
1. Hire a designer familiar with W3C standards and have your site redone, or
2. Prepare yourself for a big learning curve and a bit of frustration (though well worth both).
W3.org au aratat o directie in a realiza site-uri optimizate (Nu SEO) din punctul de vedere al Html-ului. Site-urile validate nu garanteaza un loc bun la cautari.
Apoi...3 domenii cu acelasi continut imi suna a duplicate content.
Daca testul a fost facut in ultimile 3 luni, rezultatele nu sint convingatoare pentru ca Goolge de trei lui e "cu fundul in sus" si rezultatele variaza de la o zi la alta. Criteriile de analiza si de prezentare a rezultatelor s-au/se schimba.
Fraza este foarte corecta si nu are nici o treaba cu Google. A face un site corect dpdv Html nu tine de Google ci de felul nostru (a unora dintre noi) de a realiza site-url Web.Valid HTML is important - right? We are told every day in the website owner community that valid HTML code is the 'right' way to build your website. Valid HTML allows for greater accessibility, cross-browser compatability, and can even possibly help your search engine rankings.
E super faina faza asta si e bine de urmarit.
Pacat ca nu putem face si noi niste teste si sa le publicam. Probabil ptr. non english e o "alta mancare de peste".



Eric Brewer wrote a page while at Inktomi that claimed 40% of HTML pages had syntax errors. We can’t throw out 40% of the web on the principle that sites should validate; we have to take the web as it is and try to make it useful to searchers, so Google’s index parsing is pretty forgiving.
