Link-uri si link-uri

**Cristian Mezei** · 27th May 2006, 06:10

Of ce rau imi pare ca stric topicul asta, dar atunci PLIGG il foloseste incorect.

**Krumel** · 6th June 2006, 15:54

Last updated March 8, 2006 by Joe Barker

**Krumel** · 14th June 2006, 17:32

I bring it up only because I occasionally entertain the thought that Google has, in fact, destroyed the Internet. Well, not the physical Internet, mind you. Just the whole "looking for data" part of it that's key to Google's (alleged) information-based mission. The part that's held the key (so far) to its financial success.

Defining Search Engine Relevancy - 2006

The Short Version

Yahoo!

* been in the search game for many years.
* is better than MSN but nowhere near as good as Google at determining if a link is a natural citation or not.
* has a ton of internal content and a paid inclusion program. both of which give them incentive to bias search results toward commercial results
* things like cheesy off topic reciprocal links still work great in Yahoo!

MSN Search

* new to the search game
* is bad at determining if a link is natural or artificial in nature
* due to sucking at link analysis they place too much weight on the page content
* their poor relevancy algorithms cause a heavy bias toward commercial results
* likes bursty recent links
* new sites that are generally untrusted in other systems can rank quickly in MSN Search
* things like cheesy off topic reciprocal links still work great in MSN Search

Google

* has been in the search game a long time, and saw the web graph when it is much cleaner than the current web graph
* is much better than the other engines at determining if a link is a true editorial citation or an artificial link
* looks for natural link growth over time
* heavily biases search results toward informational resources
* trusts old sites way too much
* a page on a site or subdomain of a site with significant age or link related trust can rank much better than it should, even with no external citations
* they have aggressive duplicate content filters that filter out many pages with similar content
* if a page is obviously focused on a term they may filter the document out for that term. on page variation and link anchor text variation are important. a page with a single reference or a few references of a modifier will frequently outrank pages that are heavily focused on a search phrase containing that modifier
* crawl depth determined not only by link quantity, but also link quality. Excessive low quality links may make your site less likely to be crawled deep or even included in the index.
* things like cheesy off topic reciprocal links are generally ineffective in Google when you consider the associated opportunity cost

Ask

* looks at topical communities
* due to their heavy emphasis on topical communities they are slow to rank sites until they are heavily cited from within their topical community
* due to their limited market share they probably are not worth paying much attention to unless you are in a vertical where they have a strong brand that drives significant search traffic.

Interesant de citit.

**Ben Boingeanu** · 23rd June 2006, 12:24

Sonerie pentru mobil auzita doar de persoanele mai mici de 25 de ani:

http://www.infowing.ch/web/de/static...s_teenbuzz.htm

testat pe parinti mei si merge

**Iskander** · 10th July 2006, 14:38

success la 17 ani.. acum 5 ani

**Krumel** · 14th September 2006, 12:14

Postat în original de Krumel

Quintura Inc. pregateste un nou mod de cautare pe net.

Demo. [cred ca o sa va trebuiasca banda buna sa il puteti vizualiza]

Versiunea download.

Varianta offline de vizualizare.

Si un blog.

In cazul in care cineva se incumeta sa il incerce...asteptam niste confirmari sau infirmari legat de "performante".

Revin cu acest soft: detine o optiune de cautare pe google.ro prin acest plugin Google International
Detalii

E bin ptr. cei cu idei.

Magic Words for Search Engine Optimization: Latent Semantic Indexing Demystified