Versiune printabilă
Cred ca google stie sa faca diferenta intre comentariile / linkurile puse de noi si cele puse de un eventual competitor.
Daca apar multe odata, poate fi un bulk trimis de competitie. Linkurile care apar intr-un timp mult mai lung si din surse dubioase, sunt mult mai usor de identificat ca fiind puse de webmasteri (cine sta sa puna zilnic linkuri competitorilor ? nimeni).
Incep sa cred ca este ceva defect in engine. Daca faceti cautari de genul:
"cautare normala -cuvant_care_nu_exista" siteurile penalizate apar pe pozitiile originale.(Ex. cautare : "triciclete copii -sdfsdf44sdf2sd33fs"). Teoretic -keyword trebuia sa exluda cautarile care contin cuvantul respectiv, dar se pare ca ori lucreaza pe alt index ori nu tine seama de toti factorii de ranking.
O alta intrebare pentru cei care au citit mai mult:
Panda a "rulat" o singura data sau ruleaza permanent, integrat in algoritm ?
Panda ruleaza cam odata pe luna. Site-urile prinse, sunt penalizate, cele carora li s-au facut imbunatatiri li se ridica filtrul in momentul update-ului.
Eu citisem articolul asta despre Pinguin, si de asta am intrebat, pentru ca tineam minte ca Panda a avut mai multe updateuri, din 2011 pana acum.
Mai clar de atat nu se poate. :|
"Penguin has been primarily focused on discouraging what the industry calls link spam," Navneet Virk, director of optimization at Roundarch Isobar, said. "In Google's algorithm, the links were placed with a very high value. In essence, the idea was if a lot of people were linking to a particular site or webpage, then it was considered to be a high-quality page and that impacted the ranking of that page in Google and other search engines."
"The Google algorithm is now going to try to see if the link structure is natural," Virk said. "If the linking structure is unnatural with everyone linking using the same word, Google is saying that is spam."
News Headlines
"In many cases, the affected sites had been spamming for a long time," Mr. Cutts adds.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...747002494.html
Cam la asta se rezuma PenguinCitat:
Postat în original de Maskatu
Penguin Recovery Posts Are Lying To You.Citat:
1. Penguin Isn’t a Penalty It’s a change to the ranking algorithm designed to not reward spammy techniques.
2. Simply removing bad links is NOT the way to recover from Penguin
Chances are, your site stopped ranking because many of your links stopped counting. It looks and feels like a penalty, but it’s really just a change in your link graph.
3. If you look at the keywords you were hit on, you’ll most likely discover that the only reason you ranked for them in the first place is because of your spammy links or keyword stuffing
Advice .
If there were spammy links that I controlled (like forum signatures or link wheels) I’d probably go ahead and remove them since they’re clearly not helping me. If there were links I couldn’t control though I’d ignore them and focus my efforts on building more high quality links to replace the low quality ones that Google’s no longer counting.
Of course if you were doing that from the start you wouldn’t be worrying about the Penguin update at all now would you?
Concluzionand: cine a mers pe vechiul ghid de optimizare al lui Tudi nu a avut probleme.
Pentru mine pinguinul e o chestie buna.
O modalitate de a verifica daca penguin e de vina pentru caderi : "keyword -amazon.com"
Rezultatetele afisate vor fi prepenguin.
Pare destul de silly, dar pe .ro am verificat pe 10 cuvinte cheie si chiar sunt afisate rezultate inainte de penguin.
am citit despre ea pe : seroundtable.com
Am testat si este reala afirmatiaCitat:
Postat în original de alarma
Asa cum spuneam si eu mai sus "cautare normala -cuvant_care_nu_exista" , poti folosi "-orice" nu numai "-amazon.com"Citat:
Postat în original de alarma