Google Ranking Factors

[Krumel]

Ranking Factors Version 2 Released

In August, 2005, SEOmoz launched the first series of ranking factors. We asked a dozen folks in the SEO world to vote on the importance of over 100 unique factors surmised to be part of the search engines' ranking algorithms. Today, we've released a new version that addresses many of the issues that frustrated users of the first version and updates the series to modern times.

[Ioan Margineanu]

Un plus la reputatie Damn, nu mai pot. Ms Krumi

[Krumel]

New Study on Google Ranking Factors

Nothing in the analysis will be new to long time search marketers, but since so many people new to search engine optimization ask for nice, concise lists of what’s important to rank well in the search engines, I thought I’d indulge.

* Keywords in the title tag
* Targeted keywords in the body tag
* Keywords in H2-H6 headline tags seem to have an influence on the rankings while keywords in H1 headline tags don’t seem to have an effect.
* Using keywords in bold or strong tags - slight effect
* Keywords in image file names
* Keywords in image alt attributes
* Keyword in the domain name - although, using domain names as link text may explain this
* Web pages that use very few parameters in the URL (?id=123, etc.)
* PageRank
* Inbound links - The top result on Google has usually about four times as many links as result number 11.

Additional notes:

* Keywords in the file name don’t seem to have a positive effect
* The file size doesn’t seem to influence the ranking of a web page on Google although smaller sites tend to have slightly higher rankings.

[Diana]

Multumim Krumel.

Please, traduceti-mi si mie asta, ca nu pricep:

Inbound links - The top result on Google has usually about four times as many links as result number 11.

[Pache]

Mi se pare o aproximare amatoricească. Contează mai mult autoritatea (greutatea) inbound link-urilor.

[Krumel]

Sint lucruri dupa care sa te ghidezi, nu e biblia SEO.
Sint observatiile omului.

Diana, cred ca se refera la faptu ca site-ul care ocupa pozitia 11, deci pe a doua pagina de cautari, are de 4 ori mai putine ibl-uri. Aproximativ.

E un punct de vedere.

[bogdan985]

Keywords in H2-H6 headline tags seem to have an influence on the rankings while keywords in H1 headline tags don’t seem to have an effect.

Dubios. Oricum un articole de luat in seama. Multumim de informatie.

[Pache]

Krumel, şi al meu tot un punct de vedere era.
Diferenţa dintre cele două puncte de vedere?
Cel prezentat de tine avea autoritatea pentru că era postat pe un blog cunoscut şi pentru că era prezentat de tine (printre altele admin al forumului).
Cel prezentat de mine avea autoritatea unui user cu 15 posturi.
Ca-n viaţă

[Krumel]

Pache, nu am comentat sau combatut punctul tau de vedere.
A spus doar ca postul respectiv e opinia lui si nu un post de referinta.
E la libera alegere daca crezi sau nu ce a scris omul.

Cat despre autoritati...nu trebuie sa fii admin ca sa poti posta un link. Iar eu nu l-am recomandat nimanui.
L-am postat ca sursa optionala.

Deja ajungem in alta parte.

[Ioan Margineanu]

Daca seo era stiinta se invata la scoala Toata lumea experimenteaza, gandeste si publica ceea ce stiu oricum toti Nu cred ca o sa vad un studiu cu tehnici folosite de site-urile care se bat pentru keyworduri cu adevarat tari. Si cred ca multi de aici au cativa astfel de asi in maneca