Google wins rights to Aussie algorithm
Search for secret millions + Google
Google buys Aussie invention
Versiune printabilă
The Spyware - Click-Fraud Connection -- and Yahoo's Role Revisited
How Yahoo Funds Spyware
Reclame contextuale de la softure, very very soon !
http://pahomi.blogspot.com/2006/04/softure...blicitatea.html
http://www.softure.com/contextual-search-ad-server.html
also, a se vedea si: http://pahomi.blogspot.com/2006/04/intelli...l-de.html#links
overall incepe lumea sa se pregateasca pentru intrarea google :D (just joking)
Google vision
Urmariti reportajele cu Larry Page despre viziunea Google.Citat:
It's the world's favourite search engine - but now Google has spelt out a vision for the future of the internet.
o descriere super misto a evolutiei SEO inainte si dupa Google :D
http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum3...4-30.htm#msg94
in cazul in care nu se duce cum trebuie, e al patrulea post de sus, al lui caveman.
Si poti te rog sa lasi 2 link-uri in semnatura ?
Regulament :)
Gata :)
Chiar ma intrebam... de ce nu are lumea decat cate doua :)) trebuie sa citesc si eu regulamentul ala :-<
Si ca sa nu zici ca sunt baiat rau, lasa si tu te rog la Blogoree, link-ul de Copyright :
Cod:<a href="http://farcry.daemon.com.au/"><img src="http://www.farcrycms.org/wsimages/mollio.gif" alt="FarCry - Mollio" /></a>
nu era in template, ca il lasam... daca era sa scot, scoteam la pligg, nu la template :)
Of ce rau imi pare ca stric topicul asta, dar atunci PLIGG il foloseste incorect.
Best Search Tools Chart
Citat:
Last updated March 8, 2006 by Joe Barker
How Google Is Killing the Internet
Defining Search Engine Relevancy - 2006Citat:
I bring it up only because I occasionally entertain the thought that Google has, in fact, destroyed the Internet. Well, not the physical Internet, mind you. Just the whole "looking for data" part of it that's key to Google's (alleged) information-based mission. The part that's held the key (so far) to its financial success.
Interesant de citit.Citat:
The Short Version
Yahoo!
* been in the search game for many years.
* is better than MSN but nowhere near as good as Google at determining if a link is a natural citation or not.
* has a ton of internal content and a paid inclusion program. both of which give them incentive to bias search results toward commercial results
* things like cheesy off topic reciprocal links still work great in Yahoo!
MSN Search
* new to the search game
* is bad at determining if a link is natural or artificial in nature
* due to sucking at link analysis they place too much weight on the page content
* their poor relevancy algorithms cause a heavy bias toward commercial results
* likes bursty recent links
* new sites that are generally untrusted in other systems can rank quickly in MSN Search
* things like cheesy off topic reciprocal links still work great in MSN Search
* has been in the search game a long time, and saw the web graph when it is much cleaner than the current web graph
* is much better than the other engines at determining if a link is a true editorial citation or an artificial link
* looks for natural link growth over time
* heavily biases search results toward informational resources
* trusts old sites way too much
* a page on a site or subdomain of a site with significant age or link related trust can rank much better than it should, even with no external citations
* they have aggressive duplicate content filters that filter out many pages with similar content
* if a page is obviously focused on a term they may filter the document out for that term. on page variation and link anchor text variation are important. a page with a single reference or a few references of a modifier will frequently outrank pages that are heavily focused on a search phrase containing that modifier
* crawl depth determined not only by link quantity, but also link quality. Excessive low quality links may make your site less likely to be crawled deep or even included in the index.
* things like cheesy off topic reciprocal links are generally ineffective in Google when you consider the associated opportunity cost
Ask
* looks at topical communities
* due to their heavy emphasis on topical communities they are slow to rank sites until they are heavily cited from within their topical community
* due to their limited market share they probably are not worth paying much attention to unless you are in a vertical where they have a strong brand that drives significant search traffic.
:nerd:
Sonerie pentru mobil auzita doar de persoanele mai mici de 25 de ani:
http://www.infowing.ch/web/de/static...s_teenbuzz.htm
testat pe parinti mei si merge :D
Revin cu acest soft: detine o optiune de cautare pe google.ro prin acest plugin Google InternationalCitat:
Postat în original de Krumel
Detalii
E bin ptr. cei cu idei. :twisted:
Magic Words for Search Engine Optimization: Latent Semantic Indexing Demystified
E-mail spam or high volume e-mail deployer?
Interesata aia
mersi
mai vechi insa valabil si acum:
YouTube - Web 2.0 Expo NY: Gary Vaynerchuk (Wine Library), Building Personal Brand Within the Social Media Landscape
The mythology of link building - o sa gasiti teorii interesante pe site-ul asta, asta despre link building e una dintre ele.
Cu ocazia asta am realizat ca Seopedia nu are o sectiune de discutii despre link building. To do ptr o posibila reorganizare de forum.
+1 KrumelCitat:
Postat în original de Krumel
New Google Warning "Webmaster Tools Notice of Detected Unnatural Links."
Citat:
Webmaster Tools sends out fresh warnings of "Unnatural Links".
Google Webmaster Tools notice of detected unnatural links on [domain]!
We've detected that some or all of your pages are using techniques that are outside our quality guidelines, which are available here: [google.com...]
Specifically, look for possibly artificial or unnatural links on your site pointing to other sites that could be intended to manipulate PageRank." (-subscription required)
--- Later Edit --- (ca mi-a fost lene sa apas "Edit")
Page Segmentation and the Effects on Link Building
Citat:
Not all links are created equal, however. Links provide varying degrees of benefit to the destination site. In the past, the major concern was cross-linking pages on the same site, but the search engines are deploying new strategies for ranking the significance of a link based on where it falls on a given page.
--- Later Edit --- (ca mi-a fost lene sa apas "Edit")
10 reasons you're not an 'advanced' SEO
Trist ptr. .ro ...Citat:
Knowledge of Robots.txt is not ‘advanced’
Using ‘nofollow’ may make you stupid
Saying you’re ‘black hat’ does not make you advanced
Knowing HTML is not ‘advanced’
Link building is not advanced!!!!!
Speaking at an SEO conference
XML sitemaps are not advanced
Search Geeks Speak: Community Building with Aaron Wall of SEOBook and Rand Fishkin of SEOmoz.
Care e rostul comunitatilor, discutii cu Fishkin si Wall.
Are si zoso pe blog multe lectii interesante despre online, content writting si marketing.