Esente.ro

Versiune printabilă

Arata 40 post(uri) din acest thread pe o singura pagina

8th March 2006, 10:18
GExGE

Am relansat esente.ro asa ca am adaugat parfumuri noi si pe cele vechi le`am sters.

Problema e ca de mai bine de 10-11 zile cele vechi au ramas indexate, iar cele noi nici pana acum nu au fost indexate (ma refer la pagini, nu la parfumuri :D)...

Am pus sitemap xml si i`am dat submit la google..

in paginile care vreau sa fie indexate am pus:
<meta name="revisit-after" content="3 days">
<meta name="robots" content="index,follow,archive">

... iar in celelalte (adica paginile cu parfumurile vechi + cos de cumparaturi:
<meta name="robots" content="noindex, follow, noarchive" />

O alta problema e ca de curand mi`a indexat multe pagini de forma: http://www.esente.ro/cos-cumparaturi...a&produs_id=39 .. desi la tagul <a> am adaugat rel="nofollow" acolo unde era cazul ...

Am facut si robots.txt ...

Care ar fi problemele ?

Multumesc anticipat!
8th March 2006, 11:33
Krumel

Cache

Citat:

This is G o o g l e's cache of http://www.esente.ro/ as retrieved on 25 Feb 2006 18:05:16 GMT.
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.

site:www.esente.ro

Deci de pe 25 Feb el nu a mai "publicat" nimic din modificarile facute drept dovada ca sint doar 3 link-uri din site in Google.

Pentru optiunea

Citat:

In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 4 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.

...ai link-uri inexistente si care vor fi inlocuite la urmatorul crawling.

Cred ca mai ai nevoie de rabdare.
;)
8th March 2006, 11:49
mindsoul

aveti multe erori in code, site-ul dupa cum vad este facut in dreamwaver,

Cod:

<ul> <a href="http://www.esente.ro/"><img src="images/logo.gif" title="esente.ro - un plus de eleganta" alt="esente.ro - un plus de eleganta" border="0"></a><br /> <a href="esenta-lui/parfumuri/lista-id1.html" target="_top" onclick="MM_nbGroup('down','group1','esentalui','',1)" onmouseover="MM_nbGroup('over','esentalui','images/esenta-lui-over.gif','',1)" onmouseout="MM_nbGroup('out')"><img src="images/esenta-lui.gif" alt="Parfumuri - Esenta Lui" name="esentalui" border="0"></a><br /> <a href="esenta-ei/parfumuri/lista-id2.html" target="_top" onclick="MM_nbGroup('down','group1','esentaei','',1)" onmouseover="MM_nbGroup('over','esentaei','images/esenta-ei-over.gif','',1)" onmouseout="MM_nbGroup('out')"><img src="images/esenta-ei.gif" alt="Parfumuri - Esenta Ei" name="esentaei" border="0"></a><br /> <a href="unisex/parfumuri/lista-id3.html" target="_top" onclick="MM_nbGroup('down','group1','unisex','',1)" onmouseover="MM_nbGroup('over','unisex','images/unisex-over.gif','',1)" onmouseout="MM_nbGroup('out')" style="padding-bottom:20px;"><img src="images/unisex.gif" alt="Parfumuri - Unisex" name="unisex" border="0"></a><br /> </ul>

unde sunt[*]....
in fine aveti km de code pentru a pagina cu asa putin continut...in fine
ce aveti in title aveti si in h1 si probabil in pagina, asta este bine
url- este modificat cu mode rewrite banuiesc arata user friendly si spider friendly
la keywords "parfumuri" care este destul de general sunteti in pagina 3...
la keywords "parfumuri giorgio armani" sunteti in pagina 4,
parerea mea estre ca repetati de prea multe ori "giorgio armani" in pagina aproape de spam...
http://www.aromagia.ro/product/0/details/38 asta este primul la keywords "parfumuri giorgio armani" in prima pagina ia uitativa in pagina lor si vedeti de cate ori au scris in pagina giorgio armani la densitatea de cuvinte , va spun eu 1 data in title, odata intr-un <P style="margin-top:0">Articol din categoria: Parfumuri / Giorgio Armani</P>, si inca o data in pagina scrie "armani"...nici macar nu este in h1, in h1 au scris "emporio" asta spune tot ...mai taiati ca altfel o sa ramaneti in pagina 3-4
12th March 2006, 20:08
GExGE

Nu pot sa corectez aceste erori deloc ... habar n`am care`s problemele ... imi spune ca </head> nu e deschis .. desi in sursa apare ...

Ajutati-ma sa rezolv macar cu index-ul... cu restul ma descurc (sper)...

multumesc anticipat ...
13th March 2006, 08:36
Krumel

Dupa cate vad ai specificat tipul documentului ca fiind HTML 4.01 Transitional:

Citat:

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">

Erorile de validare pe care le ai acum sint pentru ca folosesti "/" ca sa inchizi meta tag-urile. Ele sint valabile pentru Xhtlm doar.

Citat:

document type does not allow element "META" here.

Scoate "/" de la fiecarte tag.

Nu vad precizata limba in care e site-ul.

Cod:

<html lang=ro>

Sint niste elemente Html pe care ar trebui sa le folosim indiferent ca ne trebuie sau nu, sint folositoare sau inutile, "ma penalizeaza" sau nu.

Asta tine de felul in care am invatat sa facem site-uri Web.
13th March 2006, 12:35
GExGE

Merci Krumel, o parte s-au rezolvat. Acum .. cum scap de erorile de la acel swf ?
13th March 2006, 12:47
Cristian Mezei

Citat:

Postat în original de GExGE @ Mar 13 2006, 12:35 PM) [post=12225

Quoted post[/post]</div><div class='quotemain'>
Acum .. cum scap de erorile de la acel swf ?

Citat:

The embed tag is for older browsers that do not
support the W3 specification for the <object> tag
which is the now most supported and recommended option
for embedding QTVR. For example as of IE5.5 SP2, the
embed tag is no longer supported at all, yet Netscape
6 still can use it....

Typically you use both by nesting them. Browsers that
can use the <object> tag will ignore the <embed> and
older browsers that don't use the <object> tag will
use the <embed> and ignore the <object>. The most
simplest version of this combined structure should
look something like this (Apple also recommends this):

<OBJECT
CLASSID="clsid:02BF25D5-8C17-4B23-BC80-D3488ABDDC6B"
CODEBASE="http://www.apple.com/qtactivex/qtplugin.cab";
WIDTH="xx" HEIGHT="yy">
<PARAM NAME="src" VALUE="my.mov">
<EMBED SRC="my.mov" height="yy" width="xx"></EMBED>
</OBJECT>

Hope this helps :)

Deci uita de ]
Acum .. cum scap de erorile de la acel swf ?
[/QUOTE]

Citat:

The embed tag is for older browsers that do not
support the W3 specification for the <object> tag
which is the now most supported and recommended option
for embedding QTVR. For example as of IE5.5 SP2, the
embed tag is no longer supported at all, yet Netscape
6 still can use it....

Typically you use both by nesting them. Browsers that
can use the <object> tag will ignore the <embed> and
older browsers that don't use the <object> tag will
use the <embed> and ignore the <object>. The most
simplest version of this combined structure should
look something like this (Apple also recommends this):

<OBJECT
CLASSID="clsid:02BF25D5-8C17-4B23-BC80-D3488ABDDC6B"
CODEBASE="http://www.apple.com/qtactivex/qtplugin.cab";
WIDTH="xx" HEIGHT="yy">
<PARAM NAME="src" VALUE="my.mov">
<EMBED SRC="my.mov" height="yy" width="xx"></EMBED>
</OBJECT>

Hope this helps :)

Deci uita de embed si foloseste object. :)
13th March 2006, 12:48
FireEyes

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(GExGE @ Mar 13 2006, 12:35 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Merci Krumel, o parte s-au rezolvat. Acum .. cum scap de erorile de la acel swf ?
[/QUOTE]

http://www.lilianadesign.ro/

Liliana are un cod pentru swf care valideaza.
(Sper ca am inteles bine)

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(FireEyes @ Mar 13 2006, 12:47 PM) [post=]Quoted post[/post]</div><div class='quotemain'>
http://www.lilianadesign.ro/

Liliana are un cod pentru swf care valideaza.
(Sper ca am inteles bine)
[/QUOTE]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Cristian Mezei @ Mar 13 2006, 12:47 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Deci uita de embed si foloseste object. :)
[/QUOTE]

Cristi, iar am postat in acelasi timp! Bizonule :)
13th March 2006, 15:56
GExGE

Passed Validation.

Multumesc pentru sfaturi. Am facut si CSS-ul valid, apar niste warnings dar nu cred ca au mare importanta ....

Baftaaaaa...
13th March 2006, 16:08
FireEyes

Citat:

Postat în original de GExGE @ Mar 13 2006, 03:56 PM) [post=12234

Quoted post[/post]</div><div class='quotemain'>
Passed Validation.

Multumesc pentru sfaturi. Am facut si CSS-ul valid, apar niste warnings dar nu cred ca au mare importanta ....

Baftaaaa]
Passed Validation.

Multumesc pentru sfaturi. Am facut si CSS-ul valid, apar niste warnings dar nu cred ca au mare importanta ....

Baftaaaaa...

Cu placere :p

Arata 40 post(uri) din acest thread pe o singura pagina