Un nou algoritm?

[Razvan Pop]

Salut,

Se intampla ceva. Din ce in ce mai multe site-uri isi pierd pozitiile in SERPs, unele dintre ele site-uri mari si vechi.

A mai observat careva ceva?

[danic]

Da, eu. Am scazut puternic la toate cautarile.
Are cineva vreo idee?

Numai bine!

[dsa]

eu am crescut la mai multe cautari

[misu]

mie imi par tot cam la fel...

[kevinro]

S-ar putea sa fie ceva legat de tema site-ului. Eu am observat la "camere digitale" - caderea site-ului Insoft si la "locuri de munca" - disparitia lui Anunturi-gratuite.ro (care a stat in Top 10 multa vreme). Nici unul nu e in mod special despre "camere digitale" sau despre "locuri de munca". Am crezut insa ca ar fi vorba de schimbari rezultate ca urmare a schimbarii de SEO-er / proprietar.

[Yama]

E ceva obisnuit sa evolueze algoritmii de cautare la Google.

[Ovidiu Lixandru]

Originally posted by A
[b]E ceva obisnuit sa evolueze algoritmii de cautare la Google.

Din putul gandirii...

Treci putin si citeste Regulamentul. 

Ai un link in loc de locatie. Te rog conformeaza-te precum toti ceilalti de pe acest forum. Valabil si pentru cei care vor mai veni.

[Krumel]

Cei care sinteti abonati la newsletters-urile de la Webproworld, cred ca ati primit o ultima instiintare. Reproduc post-uri din discutie.

Well, it happened. The mother of all Google updates. Several of my websites that have been at #1 for many years - even through the Florida update - have dropped up to 10 places or more.

My guess is that Google is now weighing incoming links (backlinks) differently. In the past, websites with 500 backlinks that had the anchor text of "widgets" would outrank a similar site for that phrase even though the site had thousands more backlinks, but without the phrase "widgets" in the anchor text of the backlinks. It would seems as though Google has now allowed the sites with more backlinks to outrank the sites with less backlinks - regardless of the anchor text in the links.

I have wondered for years why some of my much-wealthier competitors haven't passed me up on Google before now. Many of them had better PageRank and thousands more backlinks than I did. The only difference was that their backlinks did not have the proper anchor text phrase in them, and mine did. My assumption is that Google has now decided to give less weight to the anchor text in the backlink and more weight to the link itself. Instead of looking to the link for an anchor text phrase to rank the site under, they are looking to the content of the website to determine the proper keyword phrases to rank it under.

I'd say maybe we should name this the Katrina Update because it did at least as much financial damage as Katrina did. A lot of webmasters are going to have to lay workers off because of this update. Unfortunately, it looks like the little guys have lost out to the big boys on this one.

Another possibility which I have noticed is some of the bigger Corporate sites with very large advertising dollars are showing up much higher. Some of these have always ranked well for related terms due to a huge number of IBL's but rather unoptimized keyword text. I believe Google has adjusted the strength of synonyms or related keywords in IBL text and or as you mentioned links in general are being given more weight period.

My new site fell off the map but my established actually went up on a few big keywords and slid on a few. But I have noticed some of our long time competitors fell from #3 to the 30's.

This update seems to be on the same level as Florida was. I am surprised though it had passed any quality checks before being published to all DC's. IMO the results were better before.

SEO forum members everywhere are guessing at what Google has changed in their algo to cause this update. I believe that my theory above is as good as any of them. I have seen a flurry of postings on all the SEO forums that I frequent, and all of them are reporting horrible drops in their rankings. I've never seen anything this bad - not even the Florida Update.

Google knows the financial damage this is going to cause for the little guys on the Web. The Google index has been turned upside down, with the big-money websites at the top and the little guys at the bottom. How could they do this, knowing that it will cause thousands of Internet workers to get laid off? I guess they have so much money now that they don't care anymore.

[Cristian Mezei]

Stiu ce s-a intamplat :lol:

[danic]

Originally posted by Cristian Mezei
[b]Stiu ce s-a intamplat :lol:

Si? Ce s-a intamplat? :?: